SB-9 Lot Splits in Bay Area Cities: What Owners Need to Know (2026)
Add units, split your lot, and capture new value — city-by-city breakdown of California's landmark density law
Talk to Justin: (510) 277-4420Bay Area SB-9 Market Snapshot (2026)
Context matters when evaluating any density strategy. Here's where the Bay Area stands today — numbers that frame every SB-9 feasibility conversation.
In This Guide
- What SB-9 Actually Allows
- How Bay Area Cities Have Implemented SB-9
- San Francisco Deep Dive: Rent Control, Prop M, and SB-9
- Oakland & Berkeley: Just Cause, Rent Ordinances, and SB-9
- SB-9 Exemptions: When the Law Does Not Apply
- Four SB-9 Scenarios in Bay Area Context
- The SB-9 Process Step by Step
- Does the SB-9 Math Work in the Bay Area?
- City-by-City Cost and Feasibility Comparison
- Frequently Asked Questions
Exploring SB-9 for Your Bay Area Property?
I help owners evaluate density options, understand city-specific constraints, and connect with the right design and engineering team. Call (510) 277-4420 for a no-cost feasibility conversation.
Call (510) 277-4420 Text UsWhat SB-9 Actually Allows
Senate Bill 9 took effect January 1, 2022, and it reshaped what you can do with a single-family lot anywhere in California. If you own a home in the Bay Area, SB-9 may be the most underutilized housing law on your side of the negotiating table.
The law creates two distinct rights for qualifying single-family property owners. They can be used independently or stacked together for maximum density impact.
Right 1: Duplex by Right
You can add a second unit to your single-family lot without a public hearing, discretionary review, or conditional use permit. The city must approve ministerially — meaning if you meet the published objective standards, approval is not discretionary. This applies even if local zoning historically prohibited second units on the parcel.
When you stack SB-9's duplex provision with existing ADU law, the density potential becomes substantial. On a single lot you can potentially have: the primary home converted to a duplex (two units) plus a detached ADU plus a JADU (Junior ADU) within the primary structure — up to four units on one unrestricted parcel without a lot split. The key advantage: no owner-occupancy requirement when using only the duplex provision.
Right 2: Urban Lot Split
You can split a single-family parcel into two parcels, each of at least 40% of the original lot size, with a minimum of 1,200 square feet per parcel. After the split, you can build up to two units on each resulting parcel — a legal maximum of four total units where one owner-occupied single-family home previously stood.
The owner-occupancy requirement applies here: the applicant must sign an affidavit committing to occupy one unit on the retained parcel as their primary residence for at least three years after the lot split is recorded. This rule is designed to prevent corporate assemblage of single-family neighborhoods but does not restrict what happens on the split-off parcel.
Key distinction: The duplex provision and the lot split provision are independent tools. You do not have to use both. Many Bay Area owners use only the duplex conversion — adding a rental unit without splitting the lot — because it carries no owner-occupancy requirement and avoids parcel map recording costs.
| SB-9 Provision | Duplex by Right | Urban Lot Split |
|---|---|---|
| Lot split required? | No | Yes |
| Max units on original lot | 2 (+ ADU/JADU stack) | 4 total (2 per parcel) |
| Owner occupancy required? | No | Yes — 3 years, one unit |
| Public hearing required? | No (ministerial) | No (ministerial) |
| Discretionary review? | No | No |
| New parcel sellable? | N/A — no new parcel | Yes, independently |
| New parcel financeable? | N/A | Yes, as separate lot |
| Setbacks for new units | 4 ft sides and rear | 4 ft sides and rear |
| Maximum unit size | No state cap (local obj. standards apply) | No state cap (local obj. standards apply) |
Not sure which SB-9 provision fits your situation? A 15-minute call clarifies the options.
Call (510) 277-4420How Bay Area Cities Have Implemented SB-9
Every Bay Area city must comply with SB-9 — state law preempts local zoning. But "objective standards" provisions allow cities to add size limits, design requirements, setback rules, and lot coverage caps on top of the state baseline. Here's what I've observed in practice across the region:
San Jose
San Jose adopted an SB-9 implementation ordinance early and maintains active informational resources on its planning portal. The city applies 4-foot setbacks for new SB-9 units and allows ADUs to stack with SB-9 rights. Busy permit seasons extend timelines — budget 60 to 90 days for complete applications. Development impact fees are significant but San Jose's land values make the math work in most residential neighborhoods.
Oakland
Oakland's existing density-friendly posture aligns with SB-9 intent. Many Oakland lots are already in R-2 or higher zones where SB-9 adds less marginal impact. For R-1 parcels in the hills and flatlands, the law adds real upside — especially for long-time owners with low basis. Oakland's Just Cause for Eviction ordinance and Rent Adjustment Program apply to existing units, but new SB-9 construction generally qualifies for AB 1482's 15-year exemption. Confirm with an attorney.
San Francisco
SF adopted implementation rules with design compatibility standards and architectural consistency requirements. Most SF lots are small — averaging 2,500 to 3,500 square feet — and many are in historic or protected zones where SB-9 eligibility must be confirmed parcel by parcel. SF's Prop M mansion tax (approved 2022) applies to high-value transfers and affects the economics of selling SB-9 units. Construction costs of $700 to $1,000 per square foot make feasibility sensitive to parcel-specific conditions.
Berkeley
Berkeley passed an SB-9 implementation ordinance with an 800 square foot minimum unit size — above the state minimum. Berkeley's Rent Stabilization Ordinance (one of California's oldest) covers pre-1980 construction and creates significant tenant protections that affect SB-9 planning when existing tenants are in place. The planning portal has good resources. Displacement concerns are front-of-mind in the planning department. Berkeley's hillside parcels overlap heavily with VHFHSZ fire zones — check before planning.
Fremont
Fremont's large suburban R-1 lots — many 6,000 to 10,000 square feet — are well-suited for SB-9 lot splits. A clean 50/50 split on a 7,000 square foot lot produces two 3,500 square foot parcels, well above minimums. Processing has been relatively smooth for complete applications. Fremont's more modest land values (compared to Peninsula or South Bay) mean the financial case depends on construction cost discipline and current market pricing.
Palo Alto
Palo Alto adopted local standards including design compatibility requirements and height limits. The city's historic preservation and neighborhood conservation overlays affect many R-1 parcels — eligibility must be confirmed before investing in planning. What makes Palo Alto compelling despite added friction: land parcels alone in established neighborhoods can appraise at $1.5 million to $2.5 million. If you can get through permitting, the returns can be extraordinary.
San Mateo
San Mateo offers a relatively straightforward SB-9 implementation path. Suburban lot sizes in Hillsdale, Shoreview, and Baywood neighborhoods often meet minimum thresholds with room to spare. Staff generally handles SB-9 applications efficiently. Peninsula land values support the financial case — bare parcels in San Mateo can trade at $700,000 to $1,200,000 depending on location and lot size.
Mill Valley / Ross / Tiburon
Much of Marin County falls within Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones (VHFHSZ), which constitute a categorical SB-9 exemption. Before any planning investment in Marin, confirm your parcel's fire zone designation on the CAL FIRE FHSZ viewer. Many Marin parcels — even in incorporated cities — are ineligible for SB-9. The fire hazard overlay is the single most common eligibility blocker in this submarket.
Every city listed above has nuances that don't appear in the broad strokes. Setback rules, lot coverage maximums, design review triggers, and utility capacity constraints all vary. A pre-application conversation with planning staff — before you hire a surveyor or architect — saves time and money.
Discuss Your City's Rules: (510) 277-4420San Francisco Deep Dive: Rent Control, Prop M, and SB-9
San Francisco warrants its own section because of the density of overlapping regulations that affect SB-9 feasibility. The city has more regulatory complexity per square mile than anywhere else in the Bay Area, and that complexity shapes what's actually achievable.
SF Rent Ordinance and Existing Tenants
San Francisco's Rent Ordinance (Chapter 37 of the SF Administrative Code) covers most pre-1979 multi-unit buildings and some single-family homes. If your property currently has a tenant in place, displacing that tenant to pursue SB-9 development triggers Just Cause for Eviction protections under the Ordinance. The Ellis Act — California's state-level landlord exit law — provides an avenue for owners to exit the rental market entirely, but it comes with mandatory relocation payments and a ban on re-renting for a period of years.
The practical implication: if a tenant has occupied any unit on the parcel within the past three years, the lot split provision of SB-9 is not available. You may still use the duplex provision to add new construction units, but you cannot split the parcel while a tenant has recently been in place.
Prop M Mansion Tax — Transfer Tax Implications
San Francisco's Proposition M (2022) created an additional transfer tax on high-value property sales: 2.25% on sales of $10 million to $25 million, and higher tiers above that. While most SB-9 projects in SF will not hit those thresholds, the transfer tax environment in the city is generally elevated. Factor total transfer taxes into any exit strategy that involves a sale of newly developed SB-9 parcels or units.
SF Historic Districts — The Eligibility Landmine
San Francisco has one of the largest concentrations of historic districts in California. The Richmond District, Sunset District, Noe Valley, and portions of the Mission, Castro, and Western Addition are subject to Historic Resource Surveys that can affect SB-9 eligibility. A parcel listed in or adjacent to a Historic District requires careful review — the state exemption for "historic districts" under SB-9 applies to properties officially designated as a historic resource or located within an eligible historic district.
To check your parcel's status, use the SF Planning Department's Property Information Map (PIM) and search for historic resource status before any other planning steps.
Soft-Story Seismic Retrofit and SB-9
SF's mandatory soft-story seismic retrofit program requires wood-frame buildings with five or more units over a soft story (typically parking or commercial ground floor) to be retrofitted. This doesn't directly intersect most SB-9 projects, which involve single-family to duplex conversions. But if you're adding units to a pre-1978 wood-frame structure, expect the building department to flag any structural issues — and budget for potential seismic upgrades as part of your construction cost modeling.
SF SB-9 eligibility requires parcel-by-parcel research. Start with a call before investing in planning.
Call (510) 277-4420Oakland & Berkeley: Just Cause, Rent Ordinances, and SB-9
Oakland's Layered Tenant Protection System
Oakland operates three overlapping tenant protection frameworks that affect SB-9 planning for properties with existing tenants:
- Rent Adjustment Program (RAP) — covers most residential rental units built before 1983. Limits annual rent increases for covered units.
- Just Cause for Eviction Ordinance — requires documented cause to terminate tenancy for most Oakland rentals, regardless of building age. Added after Costa-Hawkins limited rent control expansion.
- AB 1482 (Tenant Protection Act) — statewide floor providing just cause and rent cap (5% + CPI, max 10%) for buildings more than 15 years old not otherwise exempt. New SB-9 construction qualifies for the 15-year exemption from inception.
For Oakland owners considering SB-9, the critical question is whether any existing tenant on the parcel has been in occupancy within the past three years. If yes, the lot split is not available — only the duplex addition. This protects tenants from displacement via the SB-9 pathway.
Berkeley Rent Stabilization Ordinance
Berkeley's Rent Stabilization Ordinance (RSO) is one of the oldest and most protective rent control systems in California. It covers most residential units built before January 1, 1980. New construction — including new SB-9 units — is exempt from the RSO. But if your SB-9 project requires removing a rent-controlled unit from the market (for example, to convert a duplex to single-family before re-adding units), Berkeley's RSO creates substantial complications and potential relocation obligations.
The cleanest Berkeley SB-9 path: pure addition of new units to a currently owner-occupied single-family home, with no existing RSO-covered tenants to displace. Berkeley's 800 square foot minimum unit size — above the state floor — adds construction cost but also ensures any new unit you build has real market appeal.
Oakland or Berkeley SB-9 Questions?
Rent control, Just Cause, and tenant protections create real planning constraints. I help owners map the legal landscape before they hire an architect or surveyor. Call (510) 277-4420 — that's our direct Oakland/East Bay line.
Call (510) 277-4420 Search Oakland ListingsSB-9 Exemptions: When the Law Does Not Apply
Not every single-family parcel qualifies. SB-9 includes categorical exemptions that exclude certain parcels from both the lot split and duplex provisions. These are not local add-ons — they are built into the state law itself. Before investing time or money in planning, confirm your parcel clears every one of these:
- Prime farmland and farmland of statewide importance — Agricultural preservation zones under the Williamson Act and California Farmland Conservancy Program
- Wetlands — Parcels meeting federal wetland definitions under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
- Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones (VHFHSZ) — State-designated; affects much of Marin County, Oakland and Berkeley Hills, Contra Costa ridge areas, and parts of the Santa Cruz Mountains. Check at the CAL FIRE FHSZ viewer.
- Hazardous waste sites — Active cleanup sites on the Cortese List maintained by DTSC
- Earthquake fault zones — Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone parcels (common along the Hayward Fault corridor — Oakland, Fremont, Berkeley, Hayward, San Jose)
- 100-year floodplains and floodways — FEMA-designated Special Flood Hazard Areas (Zone AE, Zone A, Zone VE). Check the FEMA Flood Map Service Center.
- Conservation easements and open space — Parcels encumbered by recorded conservation easements
- Historic districts and historical landmark parcels — Parcels listed as a historic resource or within an eligible historic district (extensive in SF, also present in Oakland, Berkeley, and some Peninsula cities)
- Deed-restricted affordable housing — Income-restricted units under existing affordable housing covenants or regulatory agreements
- Tenant in occupancy within past 3 years (lot split only) — Parcels where a tenant occupied any unit within the previous three years cannot use the lot split provision. The duplex addition remains available.
- Owner has previously used SB-9 lot split on adjacent parcel — An owner cannot chain SB-9 splits to aggregate parcels beyond the statutory limit
The Alquist-Priolo exemption deserves special attention in the Bay Area. The Hayward Fault — one of the most seismically active fault systems in the US — runs through Oakland, Berkeley, Fremont, Hayward, and into the South Bay. Many R-1 parcels along this corridor sit within Alquist-Priolo zones and are excluded from SB-9. The California Geological Survey's Alquist-Priolo zone mapper is your first check.
Check Your Parcel's Eligibility: (510) 277-4420Four SB-9 Scenarios in Bay Area Context
Abstract rules become clearer with concrete examples. Here are four scenarios representing the range of Bay Area conditions I work with:
Scenario A: Fremont Owner — Split, Build, and Sell
A Fremont homeowner has a 7,200 square foot R-1 lot purchased in 1994 for $280,000. After SB-9 eligibility confirmation (no VHFHSZ, no Alquist-Priolo, no tenant in last 3 years), they split into two 3,600 square foot parcels. They hire a builder to construct a 1,400 square foot detached home on the new parcel. Total development cost: approximately $920,000 (survey, permits, impact fees, construction). Sale price of new parcel with home: $1.18 million. Net equity event: roughly $250,000 while retaining the original home — now a free-standing asset on a legal parcel.
Scenario B: Oakland R-1 — Duplex Conversion for Cash Flow
An Oakland owner in the Glenview neighborhood converts a 1,900 square foot single-family home to a duplex by adding a detached accessory dwelling unit at the back of the lot. No lot split — no owner-occupancy requirement. Construction cost for 750 square foot detached unit: approximately $550,000 all-in with permits and impact fees. Rent achieved: $2,400/month. Gross yield on construction cost: approximately 5.2%. Owner retains full lot, avoids parcel map process, and benefits from long-term rent appreciation in a tight Oakland rental market.
Scenario C: San Francisco — Feasibility Analysis Required
SF lots average 2,500 to 3,500 square feet — barely above SB-9 minimums. A 3,000 square foot lot in the Inner Richmond is technically splittable under SB-9 math (two 1,500 square foot parcels), but a 1,500 square foot parcel in SF leaves almost no room for new construction meeting 4-foot setbacks. Historic district overlay on many Richmond and Sunset parcels adds design review burden. Construction at $800 to $1,000 per square foot makes even a modest new unit expensive. Feasibility is highly parcel-specific — some SF SB-9 projects pencil beautifully; many do not.
Scenario D: Palo Alto — High Value, High Complexity, High Upside
A Palo Alto owner in the Crescent Park neighborhood has a 9,000 square foot R-1 lot. After confirming eligibility (no conservation overlay, no historic resource), they pursue a lot split creating a 5,000 and 4,000 square foot parcel. City design standards add approximately four months to the permitting process. The split-off 4,000 square foot parcel — even sold bare without any new construction — is estimated at $1.6 million based on comparable land sales. After survey, engineering, and permitting costs of approximately $90,000, the lot split itself creates a significant equity event with no construction required.
Want to model your own SB-9 scenario? Bring your parcel address and I'll walk through the math with you.
Call (510) 277-4420The SB-9 Process in Bay Area Cities
The state law sets the framework. Local cities add layers. Here is the process as it plays out in practice across Bay Area jurisdictions:
Step 1 — Confirm Eligibility (1–3 Hours)
Run your parcel through the exemption checklist before spending money on anything else. Check: zoning designation (must be R-1 or equivalent single-family zone), fire hazard zone status via CAL FIRE's FHSZ viewer, flood zone via FEMA's Flood Map Service Center, Alquist-Priolo fault zone via CGS mapper, historic resource status via city planning portal, and tenant occupancy history. This is a 90-minute research task that can save months of wasted planning expenditure.
Step 2 — Engage a Licensed Land Surveyor ($1,500–$4,000)
A licensed land surveyor confirms existing lot dimensions, verifies boundary lines against recorded deeds, and identifies a feasible split line. The two resulting parcels must each be at least 40% of the original lot size — which means no parcel can be smaller than 40% of the total — and no parcel can fall below 1,200 square feet. The surveyor's preliminary report is the foundation for every subsequent planning document.
Step 3 — Pre-Application Meeting with Planning Staff (Free to $500)
Most Bay Area cities offer pre-application consultations. Many strongly encourage or require them for SB-9 projects. Use this meeting to identify any local objective standards that will apply, confirm the city's current processing timeline, ask about known issues with your specific address or neighborhood, and get names and contacts for the planning staff who will handle your application. This meeting frequently surfaces issues that would have caused application rejection — and it saves the 60-day statutory clock from starting on an incomplete package.
Step 4 — Prepare and Submit the Ministerial Application
A complete SB-9 application typically requires: existing conditions site plan showing the property and all structures, proposed parcel map showing the split line and resulting parcels, architectural plans for any proposed new units (if included at this stage), preliminary title report, owner-occupancy affidavit (if using lot split), and the city's SB-9 application form. Cities have 60 days to respond under state law. The clock runs from receipt of a complete application — incomplete submissions restart the period.
Step 5 — Record the Parcel Map (3–8 Weeks After Approval)
After the city grants ministerial approval of the lot split, a licensed civil engineer prepares the final parcel map in the format required by the county recorder. Recording creates two legal parcels, each with its own Assessor's Parcel Number (APN). Recording fees at the county recorder are typically a few hundred dollars; civil engineering costs vary by parcel complexity but typically run $3,000 to $8,000 for the final map preparation.
Step 6 — Secure Building Permits for New Construction
Lot split approval and building permits are separate processes. Apply for building permits for any planned new construction on either parcel. Plan check reviews, development impact fees (highly variable by city — see table below), and utility connection fees all apply at this stage. Budget this carefully: in San Francisco and San Jose, development impact fees alone can reach $50,000 to $80,000 per new unit.
Step 7 — Build, Inspect, and Receive Certificate of Occupancy
Complete construction per approved plans, call for required inspections at each stage, and receive the certificate of occupancy from the building department. With a CO in hand, you can rent or sell the new unit. If you sell the split parcel, the sale can proceed as a standard real property transaction — title, escrow, financing — on the new APN.
Want Help Navigating the SB-9 Process?
I can walk you through the feasibility math, connect you with architects and surveyors who specialize in SB-9 projects, and help you understand the market value implications before you spend a dollar on planning. Call (510) 277-4420 — no obligation, no sales pitch, just straight analysis.
Call Justin: (510) 277-4420 Text UsDoes the SB-9 Math Work in the Bay Area?
The short answer: it depends heavily on lot size, city, construction costs, and your exit strategy. The Bay Area's exceptional land values mean that in many submarkets — particularly the Peninsula, South Bay, and high-demand East Bay neighborhoods — the numbers work. In others, tight margins require careful analysis. Here are the key cost categories to model:
| Cost Category | Typical Bay Area Range | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Survey and lot split engineering | $3,000–$8,000 | Higher for complex parcels or disputed boundaries |
| Architectural plans | $15,000–$40,000 | Varies by unit size and city design requirements |
| City permit fees | $5,000–$20,000+ | Varies significantly by city and unit type |
| Development impact fees | $15,000–$80,000+ | SF and San Jose on high end; Fremont/San Mateo lower |
| Construction cost per sq ft | $600–$1,000 | Detached new construction; infill premium applies |
| 1,200 sq ft new unit — all-in estimate | $700,000–$1,150,000 | Wide range; use $850K as working estimate for most cities |
| Parcel map recording | $300–$600 | County recorder fees |
| Legal and title | $3,000–$8,000 | For lot split and new parcel title work |
Land Value: The SB-9 Financial Engine
In high-value Bay Area markets, the primary financial driver of SB-9 is land value creation — not rental cash flow or even new construction. When you split a lot and record a new parcel, you create a new legal lot that the market prices based on comparable land sales in that neighborhood. In Palo Alto, Cupertino, or San Mateo, a new 4,000 square foot residential lot can be worth $1.2 million to $2 million without a single structure on it. That land value uplift can exceed the total cost of the entire lot split process by a factor of five or more.
In mid-tier markets like Fremont, Hayward, or San Leandro, land values are more modest — bare lot sales in the $400,000 to $700,000 range depending on size and location. The SB-9 math still works, but margins are tighter and construction cost discipline matters more.
Rental Cash Flow Analysis
For owners pursuing the duplex addition without a lot split — primarily for rental income — the cash flow analysis looks different. Bay Area rents for new 2-bedroom units in 2026 range from approximately $2,800/month in outer East Bay neighborhoods to $4,500/month in the South Bay and Peninsula. Against a construction cost of $700,000 to $900,000 for a new 1,000 square foot unit, gross yields typically run 4% to 6%. That's a reasonable return for a hard asset in one of the most supply-constrained rental markets in the country, particularly with the prospect of long-term rent appreciation.
Run the Numbers on Your Property: (510) 277-4420City-by-City Cost and Feasibility Snapshot
This table synthesizes what I've observed across Bay Area jurisdictions. Treat these as directional ranges, not fixed numbers — every project is site-specific.
| City | Typical R-1 Lot Size | Impact Fees (est.) | SB-9 Permitting Time | Feasibility Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| San Jose | 5,500–8,000 sq ft | $30,000–$60,000/unit | 45–75 days | Good for split-and-build; high but workable fees |
| Oakland (R-1) | 4,000–6,000 sq ft | $20,000–$45,000/unit | 30–60 days | Duplex add strong; lot split less common but viable |
| San Francisco | 2,500–4,000 sq ft | $50,000–$80,000/unit | 45–90 days | Small lots limit options; historic overlay is key risk |
| Berkeley | 4,000–6,500 sq ft | $25,000–$50,000/unit | 40–70 days | 800 sq ft min unit size; VHFHSZ in hills |
| Palo Alto | 7,000–12,000 sq ft | $35,000–$65,000/unit | 60–120 days | High design review time; land values justify costs |
| San Mateo | 5,000–9,000 sq ft | $20,000–$40,000/unit | 30–55 days | Strong lot sizes; efficient processing |
| Fremont | 6,000–10,000 sq ft | $15,000–$35,000/unit | 30–60 days | Best lot sizes for splitting; moderate land values |
| Marin County cities | Varies widely | Varies | N/A for most | VHFHSZ disqualifies majority of parcels — verify first |
Development impact fee estimates above are per new unit added and reflect 2025–2026 schedules where available. Fees are subject to annual adjustments and vary based on unit size, bedroom count, and affordable housing nexus calculations. Always confirm current fee schedules with the city's planning or building department before finalizing your financial model.
Looking at East Bay, Peninsula, or South Bay properties? Search active listings by city.
Search OaklandEvaluating San Jose or South Bay options? Browse current inventory.
Search San JoseSB-9 Questions I Get Most Often
More Questions? Let's Talk Through Your Specific Situation.
SB-9 feasibility is highly parcel-specific. I work with Bay Area owners on eligibility analysis, city-specific constraint mapping, and connecting with the right professional team. Call (510) 277-4420 for a straight-talk conversation with no sales pressure.
Call (510) 277-4420 Search Bay Area Listings
Justin Borges — LA Metro Home Finder
I'm a California real estate agent specializing in Bay Area property strategy — from traditional sales to density plays, 1031s, and investment analysis. I work with owners evaluating SB-9, ADU additions, and value-add opportunities across San Francisco, Oakland, Berkeley, San Jose, and the Peninsula. Call me at (510) 277-4420 to talk through your specific parcel.
Ready to Explore Your Property's SB-9 Potential?
I help Bay Area owners understand what's possible — from basic eligibility to full feasibility analysis with cost and value modeling. Whether you're in San Francisco, Oakland, San Jose, or anywhere on the Peninsula, call (510) 277-4420 to start the conversation.
Call (510) 277-4420 Text Us Email Justin
